The Directive distinguishes
When it comes to cybersecurity, such a dual government does not exist. In both cases, the National Cyber Security Office (NÚKIB) is responsible for oversight. Directives compared National adaptations European legislators have been generous in the NIS2 directive when it comes to setting surveillance limits. They leave member state authorities free to determine the playing field, the dividing lines.Of course, regulatory agencies can set their own regulatory methods and specific control Chinese American Phone Number List measures, taking into account the adequacy of these measures. Both should follow a risk-based approach. Develop supervisory methods and control measures based on the degree of risk. One of the options directly mentioned in the directive is targeted security audits or security inspections. between two types of audits.
https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/OO_eSmlnigwCNpXnEOGsirdHaGUkegontQyS6kr0the8ZpICiiCFitGJ77KFLWP2RgmJ3qZ2O1dtgh7S1rKeQw244SZYzdIpbbhSvHiWHjdY0pAOmWfFsgV0QOLthx33Ot7h4Z-mciIknEOhEqJ_NC4
Targeted security audits are carried out regularly by independent entities (suitably qualified) or regulators. In the event of a major incident or breach of obligations under the Directive, the obligated entity may be ordered to conduct an interim audit to verify whether corrective measures have been taken. NIS2 also adjusts the question of who pays the full cost. “The costs of a targeted security audit carried out by an independent entity shall be paid by the audited entity, unless there are legitimate grounds for determining otherwise by the competent authority,” we read in Article 32(2) of the Directive. However, implementing orders regulating the obligations of more stringent regulatory entities are treated differently.
頁:
[1]